 |
 |
 |
home page
Message category
index:
Anal fisting
Attitudes & emotions
Cindy-specific 1999
Cindy-specific 2000
Cindy-specific 2001
Cindy-specific 2002
Cindy-specific 2003
Cindy-specific 2004
Cindy-specific 2005
Cindy-specific 2006
Female ejeculation
Finding a partner
Funny stuff
Giving birth
Group-specific 1999
Group-specific 2000
Group-specific 2001
Group-specific 2002
Group-specific 2003
Group-specific 2004
Group-specific 2005
Group-specific 2006
Health concerns
Kegel exercises
Lubricants
Max. vagina size
Personal experiences
Pics and videos
Professional ladies
Sex toys & objects
Vaginal fisting info
Message: Date interracial in your neighbourhood !
From: blackempty001_good Sent: 25 May 2005 Message 1 of 7
This message has been deleted by the manager or assistant manager.
From: Jimm Sent: 25 May 2005 Message 2 of 7
Wow, the little pelvis in the picture could only do fisting with a midget. Her pelvis and her pinbone width is probably not a third as wide as this one:
http://groups.msn.com/CindyAndJoePublic/justomajorpelvisnotobese.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=11992
It's Spammmmmm for sure!
From: Partialn Sent: 25 May 2005 Message 3 of 7
Agree, Joe removes spam that directs members to non related sites--- so I can tell he hasn't seen it yet.
The little girl above has a small pelvis- compared to your JM Pelvis picture reference.
I might need a step ladder to reach the one in your reference picture My pelvis bones are not half that wide or half that tall as hers. I know such size is rare.
Glad to see another one potentially more capable of vaginal stretching.
From: Jimm Sent: 25 May 2005 Message 4 of 7
Hope Joe is ok, as I thought he would have removed this spam advertising by now.
As to the Justo Major Pelvis, I had to remove the first example I put up as my study of it revealed it was a Fake. The reference one is not and shows a very rare example.
Hopefully one of this type will enjoy vaginal stretching and join our Group.
From: Joe Sent: 26 May 2005 Message 5 of 7
How closely I monitor this group swings a lot. Some days I check in twice a day, other times I may not be near an Internet-connected PC for several days in at a time.
Anyway, the message is now gone and the poster is banned. Since you guys started a discussion on this thread I just deleted the first message instead of the whole thread.
Banning the posters of spam does not really help, as they just create a new account and re-apply, and I can't see who are potential spammers so I accept everyone.
Joe
From: ronm999 Sent: 26 May 2005 Message 6 of 7
When I used to run a group, I put the whole group on moderation. Then when someone posted, if they posted something other than spam, I would set their settings allowing them to post unmoderated. That way the spam didn't get out in the email and the spammers were put to a stop. Just a suggestion.
Ron
From: Joe Sent: 27 May 2005 Message 7 of 7
Ron,
Thanks for the suggestion. I didn't realize that individual members could be set to bypass moderation inŽa group set for moderation.
Did this policy result in any complaints from members who had never posted before and hit the moderation situation?
Are spammers ever smart enough to first post a non-spam message and then spam after they've been put on non-moderation?
Joe
![[First]](/images/bw_first.gif){kind=small} |
![[Previous]](/images/bw_prev.gif){kind=small} |
![[Index]](/images/bw_index.gif){kind=small} |
![[Next]](/images/bw_next.gif){kind=small} |
![[Last]](/images/bw_last.gif){kind=small} |