Home page       
Information pages Still pictures of sexy Cindy Cindy video clips
Message Archive
home page


Message category
index:

Anal fisting
Attitudes & emotions
Cindy-specific 1999
Cindy-specific 2000
Cindy-specific 2001
Cindy-specific 2002
Cindy-specific 2003
Cindy-specific 2004
Cindy-specific 2005
Cindy-specific 2006
Female ejeculation
Finding a partner
Funny stuff
Giving birth
Group-specific 1999
Group-specific 2000
Group-specific 2001
Group-specific 2002
Group-specific 2003
Group-specific 2004
Group-specific 2005
Group-specific 2006
Health concerns
Kegel exercises
Lubricants
Max. vagina size
Personal experiences
Pics and videos
Professional ladies
Sex toys & objects
Vaginal fisting info

Message:   Pregnant fisting - new policy here at "Cindy and Joe"

From: Cindy     Sent: 22 Dec. 2002     Message 1 of 7

Dear Members,

It's soon New Year's Day, a time to reflect on things and make New Year's Resolutions.

We have also seen MSN deleting a lot of adult groups lately, and this has given us cause to think about what kind of pictures and discussions we want to have here at "Cindy and Joe". For example, we could probably reduce the chances of this group getting deleted by MSN if we simply deleted all of the photo albums.

But on reflection we are generally proud of the pictures and other activities that can be found here at "Cindy and Joe". We believe strongly that a natural and open attitude towards sex is good for people and good for relationships, and we see this MSN group as a factor in promoting that attitude.

Most of the pictures here at "Cindy and Joe" fall into the category that MSN calls "hard core pornography", but that doesn't bother us. We would find it especially painful if we voluntarily deleted the many private pictures that couples have posted here at "Cindy and Joe". We see these pictures as a kind of "declaration of independence and solidarity" being made by the members who posted them. They too are saying that they are not ashamed of what they are doing and that they want to be part of the mutual entertaining among the couples here who are into fisting and stretching activities.

The commercial pictures, on the other hand, we could do without if necessary. To us these pictures were primarily made for the purpose of earning money, both for the photographer and for the models, with perhaps a secondary motive of wanting to entertain. And from a strictly legal point of view most of these pictures are probably copyrighted and thus shouldn't be spread around without permission.

In general though, as mentioned above, we are satisfied with what is going on here at "Cindy and Joe", and don't intend to make any drastic changes just to avoid the possibility of being closed down by MSN. (If that does happen then we'll make new decisions about what we intend to do. MSN does not get to determine what we think and feel.)

There is, however, one exception to our general satisfaction with the current situation. We have decided to adopt a new policy regarding the subject of "pregnant fisting" here at "Cindy and Joe".

We believe that perineal stretching is good for pregnant women to reduce problems during childbirth. We believe that vaginal fisting is probably safe for most pregnant women during the first part of the pregnancy. We see these activities as personal choices and we are not saying that we are against them.

However, we have decided that we do not want to have pictures depicting pregnant fisting or pregnant pussy stretching (object insertions) here at "Cindy and Joe" any more. Nor do we want to have message threads talking about pictures of pregnant fisting as an activity intended for the viewer's sexual gratification.

Our thinking is as follows: Erotic pictures showing sexual activities are fine as entertainment and for sexual gratification, in part because the woman (and man?) who was photographed is consenting to have the pictures used for these purposes. This includes pictures of vaginal fisting and pussy stretching.

But if the woman is pregnant, and if the woman's pregnancy is considered a significant factor in what makes the pictures exciting, then something is happening here which we think is unfortunate. To put it simply, we do not want to see pictures of pregnant women in a pornographic context.

In addition to this conceptual consideration we also do not want to be in a situation where we may be encouraging couples to do something which can be dangerous.

We hope you can all accept our decision, which takes effect immediately. As a result of this new policy one photo album and one message thread have been deleted.

Yours,
Cindy and Joe



From: cookie     Sent: 22 Dec. 2002     Message 2 of 7

Dear Cindy and Joe, I believe that you are doing a great job of regulating this site in a responsible and open manner. I agree with you about the commercial pictures and there not really being an asset in having them, I personally don't find them even closely as erotic and interesting as those done by "real" couples engaging in mutually enjoyable fisting and stetching play.As for pregnant fisting , I do not find them to be offensive in any way except when they appear to be done by commercial interests, and I like to see women who are pregnant still enjoying they're sexuality. Anyway thankyou for doing such a magnificent job ,hope MSN can see that also. . Have the best of Christmases and a happy, healthy new year .
Cookie
PS . The same wishes to all members.



From: Blitzppp     Sent: 23 Dec. 2002     Message 3 of 7

Thank you Cindy,

This decision to me seems like a good one. It is not like a lot of material that is just mostly consensual, harmless, or fantasy.

Activity during pregnancy is not consensual in regard to the unborn, and it might be construed as potentially harmful. Even on Cindy and Joe, we saw innumerable warnings and valid reasons in the past against doing pregnant fisting without a physician's express advice.

On the other hand, material that is akin to our freedom of speech to read and view adult material which is consensual and does not involve pregnancy is harmless, at least to third parties, and is protected by constitutional rights. Even US States like Arkansas are changing their out of date laws to allow consensual adult activity, making former President Clinton no longer a criminal in his home State. LOL

Such material on many adult sites, and certainly this adult site, should not be the bother of anyone (except maybe some anachronous politicians or other fanatic sects who put the squeeze on MSN). Unfortunately there are always some who are immature or sexually repressed in their mindset, and we will just have to wait until the great majority of the general public evolves out of such immaturity.

In Continental Europe such evolution has already taken place to a much larger extent.



From: Joe     Sent: 23 Dec. 2002     Message 4 of 7

Apropos freedom of speech, etc., I'll just emphasize that Cindy and I are not saying that we think that fisting while pregnant should be illegal, or that posting pictures of it elsewhere should be illegal. We're just saying that we've decided that we prefer to not have it on this site.

Joe



From: Spencer2000     Sent: 23 Dec. 2002     Message 5 of 7

I'm a little confused. Does this mean we can't discuss fisting and sexuallity during pregnancy in the message boards? Or just a restriction against photos?



From: Blitzppp     Sent: 23 Dec. 2002     Message 6 of 7

Spencer2000,

There has always been that type of discussion here and I for one think it should continue. On the other hand I think that Cindy and Joe, are right to stop those pictures because they might endanger the longevity of the Group.

Certainly without them no prudes can say we are showing things harmful to children (unborn babies). So if we continue to show photographic activity between "consenting adults" that does not endanger third parties, we should be free from the idiots who try to patrol the net.

Discussion is totally another issue. It is well protected by freedom of speech. So write and discuss anything you please (as long as it doesn't stray too far from the vaginal stretching-fisting topic here... and anything else that is not spam or off topic in any Group).

I totally agree with Cindy and Joe about the pictures, as there is a remote possability that they might cause trouble. They already censor photos of violent non-consentual activity and I agree with that.



From: Joe     Sent: 23 Dec. 2002     Message 7 of 7

> Does this mean we can't discuss fisting and sexuallity during pregnancy in the message boards?

Discussions are very welcome.

The thread which was deleted did include a bit of discussing but was mostly talk about pictures of pregnant fisting: An offer to make the pictures if people were interested and replies from several people who were interested.

Once again, Cindy and I are not saying that we have anything against this, but that we just prefer that it not be done here at this site.

Joe

  [First] [Previous] [Index] [Next] [Last]

All of the material on this web site is copyright © 1995-2006 by Cindy Manlove.
Click on the above link if you wish to use any material from this web site for any purpose other than private viewing.