"Cindy and Joe" Message Archive

Message Archive
home page

Message category
index:
Anal fisting
Attitudes & emotions
Cindy-specific 1999
Cindy-specific 2000
Cindy-specific 2001
Cindy-specific 2002
Cindy-specific 2003
Cindy-specific 2004
Cindy-specific 2005
Cindy-specific 2006
Female ejeculation
Finding a partner
Funny stuff
Giving birth
Group-specific 1999
Group-specific 2000
Group-specific 2001
Group-specific 2002
Group-specific 2003
Group-specific 2004
Group-specific 2005
Group-specific 2006
Health concerns
Kegel exercises
Lubricants
Max. vagina size
Personal experiences
Pics and videos
Professional ladies
Sex toys & objects
Vaginal fisting info

Message: Pinbones

From: Jimm Sent: 20 May 2005 Message 1 of 18

Partialn,

Enjoyed your pictures called "pinbones"
http://groups.msn.com/CindyAndJoePublic/justomajorpelvisnotobese.msnw?Page=2

They sure let you know that some women have a huge side to side bone opening. Your Pinbones2 woman would pass the "Head Eater Test" for Justo Major Pelvis with flying colors!

I got over 8 inches width for her bone opening using proportion and hand width.

I have tried the Head Eater test with my head face down on the edge of a bed where a woman with a very big pelvis backed up. When she spread her buttocks and sat it sure feels funny when she starts shaking my head side to side.

From: Blitzppp Sent: 21 May 2005 Message 2 of 18

Love the wide pinbone pictures. It is hard to say which best demonstrates a very wide bone opening. I like the Pinbones5 picture where her fingers are inside the opening and show the same distance from her midline as her wide finger spacing.

It appears that she is pulling her midline tissue over toward her left side which would make her bone opening even wider, as you are not measuring to where her -true midline- is located.

From: Partialn Sent: 21 May 2005 Message 3 of 18

Glad you liked them, as I am a have a "size fantasy" for a Pelvis with a large opening.
Noticed that some examiners don't ride a bicycle so they don't know that the sit bones (pinbones or ischial tuberosities) are down lower where you sit... LOL
Click on PinboneExam.Jpg below:

PinboneExam.Jpg

From: Blitzppp Sent: 21 May 2005 Message 4 of 18

Partialn, You are right.

I wouldn't want that stupid "examiner" to check my wife!

He isn't using a table with stirrups to hold her legs up high so the anus (between the pinbones) is exposed. He is not pressing into the skin to check the distance between the bones. He is pressing at the wrong place (needs to press between the ischial tuberosities or pinbones at anus level). He doesn't have a glove on the other hand with fingers along side his other hand to see if the opening is wider than one fist. If the picture is level, she will slide off his table... LOL

Surely this isn't a doctor, but someone who never did fisting, and he doesn't even know where the sit bones are.

I have seen medical pictures where the anus is exposed by having the legs bent far back in stirrups to tilt the pelvis back and expose the pinbone area. There, the doctor is pressing very deeply between those bone with his fist over the anus and he is trying to add other fingers from his other hand to see if they will also press deeply between the bones just next to his fist between the bones... to find out if the width is greater than one fist.

I have also read that with a Justo Major Pelvis two fists can fit side to side and sometimes even two seperated fists will fit between the sit bones. Some of your nice pictures show that size width between the ischial tuberosities.

The kook in the picture is trying to press between her pubic rami where there is no width, not where the center of her bone opening is.

Anyone who has done much fisting knows that when the vagina is stretched down to push the anus toward the tailbone, that there, between the pinbones, is where the largest side to side room is located... what a dummy, that is used to demonstrate this bone opening width method! With birth, the full bone width is used if there is a small pelvis and a big head, but with stretching for pleasure the width is usually a little less than that so it will be enjoyable. With birth, sometimes the tailbone is pressed back so much that it makes a groove on the baby's head as the bone opening is not enough with a very small pelvis. Nobody would ever do that size stretching for enjoyment.

>Partialn

> Noticed that some examiners don't ride a bicycle so they don't know that the sit bones (pinbones or ischial tuberosities) are down lower where you sit... LOL
> Click on PinboneExam.Jpg below:

From: Jimm Sent: 21 May 2005 Message 5 of 18

The picture Partialn posted shows how "not to measure" pinbone width.

Blitzppp, your true medical pictures discription of the correct way to do this would be interesting to look at if it is on the internet. If it is on the internet, let us know where to look.

Did they show some with two fists width between the pinbones?

Some rather thin women with a very large pelvis show about two fists width between the sit bones even without using a measurement... just looking.

Click below to take a look at "2fistswide.jpg"

2fistswide.jpg

From: Partialn Sent: 22 May 2005 Message 6 of 18

WOW!

Your 2fistswide.jpg picture that I clicked on above is just wonderful! My little head would have lots of room between those pinbones.

Now if only she does some vaginal stretching, she might enjoy doing some gentle "heading" with me

From: Blitzppp Sent: 22 May 2005 Message 7 of 18

Partialn,

I put up a picture just for you, as I know you have a "heading" fantasy, and your little head would pleasurably push and slide on inside her if she did a little vaginal stretching

I can just imagine the orgasms you both would have!

http://groups.msn.com/CindyAndJoePublic/justomajorpelvisnotobese.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=11984

From: Joe Sent: 22 May 2005 Message 8 of 18

Hi Blitzppp,

You guys really are on a roll. :-)

But we have an (unwritten) rule here that we don't like pictures that show women with medical problems, like prolapsed uterus or obessity. Let's keep medical problems to the medical sites and not make these problems into a source of sexual gratification.

Please delete the meterwide picture. Thanks.

Joe

From: Blitzppp Sent: 22 May 2005 Message 9 of 18

Thanks Joe,

Yes, this "meter wide pelvis" with the huge huge pinbone width shows a very obese woman. As that can be a medical problem, I have deleted it. I hope some members will enter non-obese examples to show such a very huge bone opening. I really doubt that one will appear, as it has been my experience that the very largest have been in rare SSBBW (obese) women. I also think I may know the reason for that.

We know that a non-obese woman can have a Justo Major Pelvis, but I believe that most non-obese women with huge size hips due to a huge pelvis, when they start getting into their 30's, find out they can't get their pelvis any smaller with dieting. Then they give up and go ahead and become obese. Most obese women are just that, and actually have an average or sometimes a small pelvis. It is just the ones who diet and can't make their pelvis any smaller and then they give up to become obese, as they get older, that seem to be the very largest.

I know there are some non-obese ones who have not given up yet, so maybe they will join our group. I have seen some pictures of young women with a very large pelvis who have not yet put on weight.

It is unfortunate that they may get a medical problem (obesity) just because they are ashamed of their huge pelvis. They should be proud of it! A large pelvis is a female trait that is valuable for many reasons. I know a lot of members here love that female trait.

From: Jimm Sent: 22 May 2005 Message 10 of 18

Thanks Joe,

Will try to conform. Let me know if I get out of line.

From: Blitzppp Sent: 23 May 2005 Message 11 of 18

Found a picture of BJ that allows measurement of her pinbones by the proportion method. It checked very well with the maximum vaginal stretching she is know to achieve.

http://groups.msn.com/CindyAndJoePublic/justomajorpelvisnotobese.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=11990

From: Jimm Sent: 23 May 2005 Message 12 of 18

Your BJ picture confirms that the proportion method can be quite accurate.

If someone with a Justo Major pelvis with a pinbone measure of about 7 to 10 inches like those demonstrated in the other pictures practiced stretcheing to their very maximum size, all the so called "World Vaginal Stretching Records" would fall... LOL

I am sure this has already been done by those women who do not wish to advertise their oversized hips and big pelvis. They are like women who try to wear too small a shoe to show how dainty their feet are.

I wish they would be proud of their huge pelvis.

From: Partialn Sent: 27 May 2005 Message 13 of 18

Blitzppp,

The BJ picture confirms the accuracy of the (screen opening/screen known width) x actual known width) = (true opening width) ratio-proportion method.

As Jimm noted in another post, if just the skin is dented in and the fingers are not deep into the pinbone opening, those pictures are not always accurate. I even removed a picture of that type after studying it.

What I wish would happen is that lots of members who post some pictures would also post-- just one picture-- showing their pinbone measure by this method of bending over and pulling their fingers of both hands to the sides, with fingers just inside their pinbone opening. That would be an accurate measure especially if they pull firmly and report their hand width for reference measure.

From: Jimm Sent: 28 May 2005 Message 14 of 18

It would be nice to see some members put up thay type of picture showing their pinbone width.

Partialn, as you are looking for large pinbone opening size, it is very unlikely you would find even one such picture.

Probably only 100 women post pictures here and if all of them put up a picture, and you are looking for those with a 6 inch or more opening width, there would be less than a 50:50 chance just one would show that size.

Because very few would put up pictures the likelyhood is almost 0 you would get to see even one 6 inch pinbone opening size. The likelyhood of a member here posting a picture showing a Justo Major pinbone opening size over 6.75 inches is not statistically significant although you might count on one hand, the women who have visited here have Justo Major size and they are probably not even active members, and won't post any type pictures..

From: Partialn Sent: 29 May 2005 Message 15 of 18

Jimm,

You are probably right that there would only be a very very few women who have ever joined the Group here that actually have a Justo Major Pelvis. If such a beautiful woman ever visits here maybe she will look around and find what a Justo Major Pelvis is and find that some members here strongly welcome her and want to let her know that any vaginal stretching she does is very much admired and appreciated here.

She would then soon become aware that some very nice male members are looking for someone just like her.

There are several on our group who would love to see just anything she would be willing to share-- even text messages. Maybe someday one with that size pelvis will come to our Group and will communicate with the Group-- or at least communicate with those who express such admiration and appreciation--- I hope so. I think such a woman is the most beautiful thing that exists.

From: PurpleDragonFly_7 Sent: 7 July 2005 Message 16 of 18

My husband and I just checked my pinbone and its 5.5 inches...so is that a good size?

From: Jimm Sent: 23 July 2005 Message 17 of 18

5.5 is much larger than the average side-to-side bone opening width of her pelvic opening.

She is not Justo Major size (6.5 inch side-to-side), but she is still a very large size compared to the average.

Thanks for letting us know that some on the group are not just "average size", as your wife has a very nice stretching potential... LOL

From: Partialn Sent: 24 July 2005 Message 18 of 18

Forgot to mention that your greater than average (14 cm) pinbone width explains why your husband can get two fists into your opening easily.

Because of the hysterectomy problem shortening depth, that you mentioned, you may have to settle for width and --less depth.

Thanks Joe, for the reference to old Group material... so members can better decide how to deal with gyn surgical questions... before any possible surgery.

Unfortunately you were not a member of this group when such surgical problems were discussed years ago.