"Cindy and Joe" Message Archive

Message Archive
home page

Message category
index:
Anal fisting
Attitudes & emotions
Cindy-specific 1999
Cindy-specific 2000
Cindy-specific 2001
Cindy-specific 2002
Cindy-specific 2003
Cindy-specific 2004
Cindy-specific 2005
Cindy-specific 2006
Female ejeculation
Finding a partner
Funny stuff
Giving birth
Group-specific 1999
Group-specific 2000
Group-specific 2001
Group-specific 2002
Group-specific 2003
Group-specific 2004
Group-specific 2005
Group-specific 2006
Health concerns
Kegel exercises
Lubricants
Max. vagina size
Personal experiences
Pics and videos
Professional ladies
Sex toys & objects
Vaginal fisting info

Message: Justo Major Pelvis

From: Blitzppp Sent: 1 May 2005 Message 1 of 17

The new picture

http://groups.msn.com/CindyAndJoePublic/justomajorpelvisnotobese.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=11862

must be a very rare one to have that large a pelvis and still not be a SSBBW type.

If she starts vaginal stretching, the facesitting could be dangerous

From: Partialn Sent: 5 May 2005 Message 2 of 17

The new pictures in the Justo Major pelvis folder are interesting as they show ones that could really do extreme stretching with practice.

The JMpelvis15 picture says that she could do 8 inches across. Is that the size of her bone opening in the pelvis?

From: Jimm Sent: 6 May 2005 Message 3 of 17

If she were 8 inches side to side bone opening and the average woman is close to 4.5 inches, then 8 divided by 4.5 would make her 1.777 times average and be over the 1.5 ratio needed to have a "Justo Major" pelvis.

Yes, the 8 inches is conservative and derived by proportion. I noticed that she was pulling her anus opening to the left side away from her midline. Her fingertips were inside the bone, and against the left pinbone on the inside of her pelvic opening. So all I needed to know was the distance between the pinbone on the left to the pinbone on the right (as that is the distance across of the opening in the bones).

Try looking at the JMpelvis15 picture and see what you get for a distance across her bone opening.:

Because the anus is pulled far to her left, I could not use that for the pelvic midline. Twice the distance from her fingers to her midline would naturally give the opening distance across, so the problem was to find her midline.

I drew a line from her front labia midline to the middle of her sacrum and called that the pelvic midline. The middle of her sacrum is half way between the two dimples called "Dimples of Venus" (where you see her sacrum make two skin dimples). After drawing that line, I measured from where her fingers were inside the bone opening to the pelvic midline.

Taking twice that measure (to get the opening distance) and dividing by the width of her hand tells the ratio of how much larger her opening is than her hand width. I found my measure was a little over 3 times as wide as her hand. If her hand is at least 3 inches wide, then the proportion would make her opening (3+ x 3) over 9 inches (23cm). I wanted to be conservative so I called her boney pelvic opening 8 inches (20cm) side to side (sorry for the long explanation).

From: Partialn Sent: 7 May 2005 Message 4 of 17

Thanks Jimm,

I tried your estimation method and got 10 inches for her opening width, but even if her bone opening was 8 inches wide, that is extreme. I know she would probably never practice stretching to her full 8 to10 inch maximum possible. I was thinking that if the average size woman that does fisting can take a fist or hand 3.5 inches wide, which would be an inch less than her 4.5 inch bone opening width, then after this woman in the photo did stretching, she would also enjoy taking an inch less stretch than her 8 to 10 inches width!!.

She would be hard to satisfy if she started big vaginal stretching!

I just pressed the tips of my eyeglasses legs tight against the back of my ears to find my maximum head width.

When I held that distance onto a ruler, my head was 5.75 inches wide... WOW!! I think I would volunteer for "heading" her if she wanted to try that, as once she got to just moderate stretching, it would be easy for her to do :-)

From: Jimm Sent: 7 May 2005 Message 5 of 17

Thanks Partialn,

For those who are fascinated by the very largest vaginal stretching, these very rare women with a Justo Major pelvis offer that possibility. I tried measuring across my head and found 5.82 inches maximum width. Your "heading" is a stimulating fantasy, but rather unlikely unless some of these rare ones get into large stretching.

Certainly her 8-10 inch pelvic opening would allow that in cases like this woman.

Possibly others who haave studied art and proportion could also make a guess as to her pelvic opening width.

To be non-obese, she is a rare one! In her case, being non-obese, her fingers are able to sink inches deep inside the edge of her bone opening. That makes such measurement possible by proportion when twice the distance to her midline is found.

From: NickHan Sent: 9 May 2005 Message 6 of 17

Is it possible that members of this group have never heard of Photoshop? I assume this pic and a similar one to be faked

From: Jimm Sent: 10 May 2005 Message 7 of 17

There are women with a Justo Major Pelvis (Giant Pelvis), and I believe this is most likely one of them.

I have seen a video of a thin but very tall woman with a pelvis over twice as wide as the man that is having relations with her. They are both on their sides and he has to be on pillows to do if from behind... and he is still is not high enough to reach her well as his pelvis is less than half as wide her pelvis side-to-side. Such a woman possibly could stretch to 26 inches around (66 cm)... or twice as far the larger ones on this group if she worked very hard at practicing this fantasy

These women with a giant pelvis are very rare.

I only wish some were members of our Group, but statistically it would take very many groups of this size to just have one with her giant pelvic size.

From: Partialn Sent: 12 May 2005 Message 8 of 17

I wish you would post a video clip of the non-obese girl from the Video you mention, if you can't post the video. If she is more than twice the pelvis width of her lover, that would be erotic. I had relations with a woman that enjoys large stretching where I used a pillow for my hips to reach her vaginal opening when lying behind her. She was probably not nearly twice my hip width. That would be amazing for a non-obese woman. I bet other men on our Group with a less wide pelvis have also used pillows to enter their wife from behind.

If the woman you mention could practice and stretch twice the size around an object of the largest on this group that would make the largest stretchers here about 13 inches around. Is that what some of the largest here stretch?

WOW! 26 inches around would be almost 5 inches more around than what my maximum head measures around! 5 inches -less- than a equivalent stretch should be comfortable for her after a few months practice.

Maybe to do adult "heading" she wouldn't have to stretch the equivalent of the largest on our Group. I have seen pictures of a few small adults that have a 15 inch around head. Women have done 2 liter bottles that are 14.5 inches around and a few have done 3 liter bottles that are 16 inches around. I think I viewed a picture of a member of this group with a 3 liter bottle.

From: Jimm Sent: 13 May 2005 Message 9 of 17

> NickHan Sent: 5/9/2005 4:06 PM
> Is it possible that members of this group have never heard of Photoshop? I
> assume this pic and a similar one to be faked

You were correct.

I checked and found one picture was "morphed" and removed it from the folder.

If you find any others to be, let us know.

Thanks

From: Blitzppp Sent: 30 May 2005 Message 10 of 17

In the1950's burlesque show photo that shows the Dwarf looking at her back side, while the girl is passing a note back to the little Dwarf. Can you imagine what is written on that message?
http://groups.msn.com/CindyAndJoePublic/justomajorpelvisnotobese.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=12017

From: Jimm Sent: 30 May 2005 Message 11 of 17

I would guess it says: "How long can you hold your breath"

From: Partialn Sent: 31 May 2005 Message 12 of 17

Thought the old Burlesque picture of the Dwarf was fun, even though the actress in the old stage show has a close to average size pelvis--- couldn't resist posting it. I found it on many different sites that show old pictures of Dwarfs. A few are like this one and have a head size that matches their body size and are called "Proportional Dwarfs".

I certainly doubt in real life the little Dwarf did any "heading" with her, although with his tiny proportional size head her pelvis to him would "appear" Justo Major. In fact his tiny head size would fit many thousands of women who already do fisting.

From: Jimm Sent: 31 May 2005 Message 13 of 17

Partialn,

Your search for a Justo Major Pelvis might not be that difficult if you let women know you admire a disproportionally large one. I would guess that one in a thousand adult women have one. As 1.5 times the average 11 inch wide upper pelvis is Justo Major, that means a pelvis 16.5 inches wide. Just to know that such size is rare but not that rare, old studies of thousands of pelvises found one in 2500 women had an 18 inch width pelvis. I found a recent study of Hispanic Americans that showed out of about 3,005 adult women examined by accurate pelvimetry (over 11,000 men, women, and children were tested) the largest pelvis was 47.3 cm wide or almost 19 inches.

Taking the approximate average of those two studies, suppose that one adult woman in about 3,000 is 18.5 inches wide. That is 2 inches larger than Justo Major, so that is the reason I think that one in a thousand would have a Justo Major.

Cheer Up, now all you have to do is date a thousand women... LOL

From: Partialn Sent: 1 June 2005 Message 14 of 17

Jimm,

My you are encouraging! (>Taking the approximate average of those two studies, suppose that one adult woman in about 3,000 is 18.5 inches wide. That is 2 inches larger than Justo Major, so that is the reason I think that one in a thousand would have a Justo Major. Cheer Up, now all you have to do is date a thousand women... LOL )

First of all I would take the one with the 2 inches over Justo Major so things would be very comfortable (18.5/11)x4.5 would make her pinbone opening 1.8 inches wider than my head and that would be the very same clearence space that an average pelvis vaginally stretching only 2.7 inches wide would have. The only problem is that I now need to date one woman every week willing to try some mild stretching for the next (3000/52) about 58 years But the good news is that to have about a 50:50 chance of finding her I only need to look for (58/2) 29 years

From: Blitzppp Sent: 1 June 2005 Message 15 of 17

Just looked and we have over 20,000 members. If those statistics are correct and about 6,000 our members are women, then "already" about two women with a 18.5 inch wide Justo Major Pelvis has visited here. Too bad she didn't let you know before she left, LOL !

Maybe another one will come along about every year or two.

From: Jimm Sent: 4 June 2005 Message 16 of 17

Blitzppp,
In your "Open" picture the pelvis looks a little smaller than average.
http://groups.msn.com/CindyAndJoePublic/bigpussy.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=12110
Instead of 2, it would require 4 hands pulling to show this same shape of opening stretch in a true Justo Major Pelvis. If it were that size, I would rather see your fantasy method of demonstrating the opening size... LOL

From: Partialn Sent: 5 June 2005 Message 17 of 17

Thanks,

The picture does show a little smaller than average pelvis. The hamstring tendon points to the right pinbone and where the anus would have been without stretching, so you can see how far back, all the way to the tailbone, the vagina is stretched.

A Justo Major pelvis would not require this huge degree of stretching for "my fantasy"