"Cindy and Joe" Message Archive

Message Archive
home page

Message category
index:
Anal fisting
Attitudes & emotions
Cindy-specific 1999
Cindy-specific 2000
Cindy-specific 2001
Cindy-specific 2002
Cindy-specific 2003
Cindy-specific 2004
Cindy-specific 2005
Cindy-specific 2006
Female ejeculation
Finding a partner
Funny stuff
Giving birth
Group-specific 1999
Group-specific 2000
Group-specific 2001
Group-specific 2002
Group-specific 2003
Group-specific 2004
Group-specific 2005
Group-specific 2006
Health concerns
Kegel exercises
Lubricants
Max. vagina size
Personal experiences
Pics and videos
Professional ladies
Sex toys & objects
Vaginal fisting info

Message: Head out pic by Blitzppp - Very hot!

From: jman128 Sent: 9 Feb. 2004 Message 1 of 22

Love that big open pussy pic with the man's shaved head right next to it with the along with the words about the possibilities that exist.

Would love to hear more about that pic and how her pussy was stretched out that big to stay open on its own like that. Did she take the head or is that supposed to only be wishful thinking?

Thanks, Jman

From: Jimm Sent: 9 Feb. 2004 Message 2 of 22

Lovely picture!

Just looking at the picture perspective with the head magnified in the foreground, it is hard to analyze. The vaginal opening would have opened enough to push the anus backward toward the tailbone.

Maybe that is the reason the anus looks like it does, as with such backward pushing by the large vaginal opening, the anus often opens wide and points downward. It looks pouty now.

This gal must have close to 8 inches from the front vagina to her tailbone (which is over 2 inches behind where her anus is now as the anus moves with vaginal stretching).

This indicates an unusually large pelvis. I would guess it has been less that a couple of minutes since the vagina has been stretched to its full opening size, as it looks to be still closing. Wish there was a video!

From: jman128 Sent: 10 Feb. 2004 Message 3 of 22

Another thought I had was that if the guy's head had actually just been inserted in that big open pussy a few minutes earlier then why wouldn''t the guys head be still wet and sticky with her pussy juices after he pulled his head out? But on the other hand her pussy looks dry inside also so you never know. Thanks, Jman

From: Jimm Sent: 10 Feb. 2004 Message 4 of 22

It looks pretty shiny and slick, but I think I see two puddle spots of liquid on the towel below her that might be where her anus was pressed onto the green towel beneath her when the huge vaginal opening stretched it clear back against it?

It is hard to figure it out without the video (I wish were available) to know whatever they did. Anyway, the fantasy of the view is tremendous! :-)

From: Blitzppp Sent: 11 Feb. 2004 Message 5 of 22

Sorry Jimm I didn't get you this new picture before posting it, but they just e-mailed it to me. I liked it so much I posted it.

They said it was ok to share if I kept identities confidential, and said this was just a fabulous and wonderful new activity... LOL But I have no idea except what I see.. It just looked like something I thought was erotic and sensual whatever the reality behind it is.

This lady looks like 4 inches (10cm) would just fall into her now, and to me she appears to be closing from a much much larger stretch of maybe 7+ inches..

Some openings I have seen that appear very tiny before stretching will open over 4 inches, but afterward they very very quickly close to appear small again . For this lady to look this big now, how big would she have to been stretched before closing back up and look like this?

From: jman128 Sent: 11 Feb. 2004 Message 6 of 22

It really is a great pic, makes you wonder about the possibilities of if she could have or maybe actually did take the head inside that big still open hungry pussy.

If there are any more pix available of what they were doing to get her pussy stretched out that big would love for you to get them and post them here, thanks, Jman

From: Jimm Sent: 11 Feb. 2004 Message 7 of 22

Blitzppp, how long did it take the BallWand.jpg (click on below) when it came out to allow the vaginal opening to close to the size of the HeadOut.jpg? The anus is pointed down and appears stretched open in the BallWand pic, but it may not be stretched quite as large as the HeadOut had to open?

BallWand.jpg

From: Blitzppp Sent: 12 Feb. 2004 Message 8 of 22

I would think with a round object, like the Ball, the vagina wouldl close quicker than something oblong like a head... that had more front to back distance for the same circumference.

Remember heads have a "cephalic index" of around 0.8 (or a 1.00 side-to-side to 1.25 front-to-back ratio... like 5.8 inches wide to 7.25 inches front to back).

Notice that the anus is not pushed back as far with a 6.8 inch diameter Ball as it would be if a same circumference head were surrounded. Even so, the Ball removal mostly closes in just a few seconds.

Maybe others can give their experience on how long this "closing" takes that they notice after large stretching.

It is probably best to just enjoy the erotic nature ot this -- than to analyze

From: Casey3947 Sent: 13 Feb. 2004 Message 9 of 22

It is a shame that you do not have video of this activity. If I were filming it, I would concentrate on the woman's face. Shoot from over the man's back, with the position of his head just in the bottom of the frame, so that we could see the expression on her face change with his movements. Perhaps this would convey her feelings better than anything someone could write.

From: Jimm Sent: 13 Feb. 2004 Message 10 of 22

Caseu3947, You would make a good videographer... LOL That would make the video a classic!

In this case you probably meant to shoot over his chest, as they do this as he lies on his back between her legs with his head pushed backward into her, so the smallest possible dimensions of his head are used to fit inside her.

But the same effect would show on the video with the very very erotic expressions on her face.
Great idea-- if only Blitzpp can talk his friends into making one :-(

From: Joe Sent: 13 Feb. 2004 Message 11 of 22

Gives a whole new meaning to the concept of "giving head"! :-)

Keep up the good work, Blitzppp.

Joe

From: Blitzppp Sent: 14 Feb. 2004 Message 12 of 22

Thanks Joe, I will if they let me in on more of this very unusual material. I heard it takes a pelvis at least 1.55 times normal measure and a lot of stretching to do this.

Jimm, You are correct about the easiest way is backing in. This makes a better fit, as the back part of the pelvic bone opening is wider... just like the back of your head is wider than the front. Check your head width sliding the legs of your glasses to the front to see it is less wide.

With such a video angle (as long as the mouth is partly outside her) both participants facial expressions would show together in the video and the effect would most exotic and erotic.. LOL

From: Joe Sent: 15 Feb. 2004 Message 13 of 22

Blitzppp,

Sorry, but as you can see on another thread someone got the idea that the head was that of a baby. Even though I'm 100% sure that the head in the picture was that of an adult, just the fact that someone could make the mistake of thinking that it was a baby (or a child) in the picture is enough for Cindy and I to err on the side of safety and to delete the picture. We did this both to ensure that our very strong attitude regarding child pornography is totally clear, and to avoid any chance of MSN Groups responding to a complaint by closing this web site down.

Just for the record, we are not only sure that the head in the picture was that of an adult, but also that the picture was a fake. My previous message, where I wrote "keep up the good work", was my tongue-in-cheek way of complementing you (or whoever made the picture) for your skill in using Photoshop or whatever was used.

It's too bad that this mistake occurred. The picture was well-made and very good in invoking the fantasy of "head fucking", perhaps the ultimate fantasy for those of us who love vaginal fisting and pussy stretching. I'm sorry we felt it necessary to delete it.

If you ever come across something similar, where there is no possibility for the kind of misunderstanding that occurred in this case, then you are welcome to post it.

Joe

From: Blitzppp Sent: 15 Feb. 2004 Message 14 of 22

Joe,

Thank you, as I was not completely sure this was authentic. It looked real enough as the opening had size and shape features that would fit this ultimate stretching fantasy.

Someone's mistake thinking the head was a baby was obviously due to failing to look closely.

I would never post off topic pictures that "did not" depict vaginal stretching. Certainly I also abhor anything with underage subject material.

From: jman128 Sent: 16 Feb. 2004 Message 15 of 22

Hi, I agree with you, I thought the guy with his head showing in the pic looked more like say 30 years old,
looked nothing at all like a baby's head, thanks, Jman

From: jman128 Sent: 16 Feb. 2004 Message 16 of 22

Hi, I agree with you, I thought the guy looked more like he was say 30 years
old or so, thanks, Jman.

From: st101z Sent: 24 Aug. 2004 Message 17 of 22

Head in pussy? I cant believe..Can put head in the pussy???
Who have that kind of pic?
Can send me to see?

From: Jimm Sent: 25 Aug. 2004 Message 18 of 22

st101z,

That picture from Blitzzp was removed because someone thought the bald head was possibly of a child, so I put up one of the same girl I found without the bald head on our picture section... just for fun. She looks like she is big enough for double fisting without even doing ANY stretching, The idea is erotic to me, but only if it is mutually erotic and extremely pleasurable to the participants.

It's a long stretch :-), but the girl in the pic might be one who could do an adult head insertion.

From: st101z Sent: 25 Aug. 2004 Message 19 of 22

Jimm
You also have that pic? Can send mail to me?

From: Jimm Sent: 27 Aug. 2004 Message 20 of 22

st101z,

No need to e-mail it because it is on our pictures section here. Just click on this to view it:
http://groups.msn.com/CindyAndJoePublic/bigpussy.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=10591
She appears to be about 4 inches open now without any stretching and would need to stretch down about another 3 inches to fit inside the back of an adult head. That may be possible here because in women who stretch much like this, the anus easily moves down as the back wall of the vagina stretches down. As much as she appears to stretch, with a little pressure, her lower vaginal rim will probably stretch back all the way down to her tailbone.

You won't see many who have the potential for an adult head insertion as only one in a population of about 20,000 has a pelvis large enough where stretching practice would work without pain.

An actual picture is very very unlikely (see the reasons in my "Real Head Pics" post)

From: st101z Sent: 27 Aug. 2004 Message 21 of 22

Oh~thank you the replaylooks.
Like has in Pervideo saw sells the similar movie (but he say that is fake).
Have anyone saw that?
Was sorry my English is very bad , If has understands ,Please many forgives.(^^)

From: Jimm Sent: 27 Aug. 2004 Message 22 of 22

Yes, the video you mention with a latex vagina and a fake pelvis and legs has been discussed here before..

In that case the woman's fake pelvis is much much to small for a real head insertion. In that video, the pelvis is not even 1.5 times average. (which is about the smallest possible pelvis ratio to do an adult head even with pain).

I think that to be able to do this without pain after a lot of stretching practice, the pelvic size ratio needs to be 1.9 or 2.0 (or greater). This is because with a lot of stretching practice, the average woman can be comfortable with 2.8 inches (7 cm) across by 3.5 inches (8.9cm) front to back (which is about 11 inches around for an oblong object or 22 inches for an oval adult head).

The average head is a .8 ratio for the cephalic index (across divided by front to back) size and the pelvis is designed for such a ratio. For example, the actural average across opening for a vagina would only have to be able to stretch 3+ fingers wide for a twice as wide pelvis to be able take in an adult head. Maybe only one out of a total population of 20,000 would have that large a pelvis, but comfortable stretching size could be reached in that one woman with practice.