Home page       
Information pages Still pictures of sexy Cindy Cindy video clips
Message Archive
home page


Message category
index:

Anal fisting
Attitudes & emotions
Cindy-specific 1999
Cindy-specific 2000
Cindy-specific 2001
Cindy-specific 2002
Cindy-specific 2003
Cindy-specific 2004
Cindy-specific 2005
Cindy-specific 2006
Female ejeculation
Finding a partner
Funny stuff
Giving birth
Group-specific 1999
Group-specific 2000
Group-specific 2001
Group-specific 2002
Group-specific 2003
Group-specific 2004
Group-specific 2005
Group-specific 2006
Health concerns
Kegel exercises
Lubricants
Max. vagina size
Personal experiences
Pics and videos
Professional ladies
Sex toys & objects
Vaginal fisting info

Message:   Headfist

From: Sarah     Sent: 6 Jan. 2002     Message 1 of 9

I ran over a filmclip at www.snuffx.com with a woman taking a mans head in her cunt. It is astonishing. All though my husband and I have practiced fisting for several years, my cunt is not nearly that big now. Do you think, that the film is real or some trick. Do you believe, this kind of extreme is fun for either part?
Love Sarah



From: zappaz1     Sent: 6 Jan. 2002     Message 2 of 9

Sarah,

It is extremely unlikely you could ever be large enough to take an adult head inside your vagina.

The odds are that only one female pelvis in thousands is large enough (even with months and months of vaginal stretching) to take an adult head inside the vagina. I am sure that less than one in a million couples have done this, as credible reports of adult vaginal head insertions are very rare.

As to the video clip you saw, it is thought to be a fake. Notice the size of the lady and the midriff cloth, used to cover up the probable prosthetic latex vagina being used. In exams of many thousands of ladies, I felt lucky to have seen only two whom I think were that vaginal size. Both were unusually tall and both of them had a disproportionately much larger pelvis than you would expect from their extreme height. Their boney features were much much heavier than the lady seen in the video clip.

Unless you have a pelvis that is twice the boney pelvic diameters of a typical male pelvis (like the example picture I placed in the 'Pictures' section on this site: Section 6 under 'Pictures found on the Internet': Section 2, last picture) you could not be large enough.

As to being pleasurable, any large vaginal stretching that is _not_ done to the point of pain can be very enjoyable, with multiple strong orgasms. However, only try what you 'can do'! LOL Best wishes.



From: zappaz1     Sent: 7 Jan. 2002     Message 3 of 9

Sarah,

I noticed someone has posted a picture taken from the adult head insertion video clip that you asked about in our pictures on this site.

It is located in the Pictures section here: 'page 6', 'Pictures found on the Internet', 'page 2' (upper left diagonal from the picture that I placed, showing what a large pelvis looks like).

If you look closely at it, the prosthetic latex vagina is placed too far anterior (where the pubic bone would be in real life). That demonstrates this has to be a fake... unless this was one of the extremely rare cases where the pubic bone is absent in the front of the pelvis. That would be extremely unlikely. Also, there would not be room for the complete head in a pelvis the small size shown in the picture. Another thing is, that heads that have been inserted are done with the back-top of the head in first, instead of face down... as the video shows. This is done to take advantage of the smaller diameters required for insertion.

I do not think any of the pictures on this site show a vagina large enough for such activity. Even the big BBW picture placed next to the one I left only shows a vagina open less than 7 inches front to back, and without a very small head, it would require a little more stretching. However, that one does show the cervix (barely seen just above the toy football) showing how there is a pocket (posterior fornix) of vagina behind the cervix that would allow much more depth to the vagina.



From: nixoff     Sent: 10 Jan. 2002     Message 4 of 9

Hiya!
Unless I'm completely wrong, this clip exists in two versions. The longer of the two also shows another amazing quality to this woman; her incredibly crumpling leg! :-)
When the man puts his hand on her thigh he makes some very strange 'dents' in her 'flesh'. It's on the edge of the picture and at the very last few seconds but quite visible all the same.
I have heard of a shorter version of this clip with those telling last few seconds removed. Perhaps this is the one you have.
So much for the clip. Perhaps it is best to let it remain an extreme fantasy...

Hey Zappaz1! Have you heard that 'a-million-to-one' shots crop up nine out of ten? :-) (Kudos to T.Pratchett, OBE, for that one :-)



From: zappaz1     Sent: 10 Jan. 2002     Message 5 of 9

Nixoff,

Thanks for the information about the 'crumpling leg', as I have not seen that version of the 'Head Insertion Clip'. That alone would settle the question about the clip being real or fake!

Even though this is an 'extreme fantasy'... as you mention... I know several who have this same fantasy. Those people told me it was either a 'back to the womb' fantasy or the idea of having their 'Soul' (that is inside their head) inside another. This fantasy is the very maximum size vaginal stretching fantasy possible, in my opinion.

Of those that I have known, surprisingly more women have wanted to be the one that inserts their head than men About the two ladies I have seen (that were large enough), I would never reveal their identities.

I suspect as rare as this is, we will have to wait _years_ to see a 'real video'!



From: Sarah     Sent: 12 Jan. 2002     Message 6 of 9

Thank you all, for helping me with my doubts. It's fantastic, how technic can cheat these days.



From: nixoff     Sent: 18 Jan. 2002     Message 7 of 9

Hi again!
Zappaz1, the clip with the leg bit seems to be in the 'member's videos' section of this group. Check her left leg just after he's pulled his head out. His thumb make her leg crumple in a very unanatomical way.

cheers!

PS. Sarah, imagine what we could see if the hight-tech ppl of the Hollywood porn industry let their minds wander a bit in 'our' direction... :-)



From: Joe     Sent: 19 Jan. 2002     Message 8 of 9

nixoff,

> imagine what we could see if the hight-tech ppl of the Hollywood porn industry let their minds wander a bit in 'our' direction

Yes, I'm thinking that the future of pornography has lots of innovations ahead of it.

The concept of making movies completely digitally (no human actors) is becoming more and more realistic. "Toy Story" was the first major attempt and there have been several more since then. The technology for making "digital people" gets better and better.

It is also a well-known fact that all of the high-end programs and computer hardware sooner or later become affordable for the consumer or small business. The first morphing programs required minicomputers and took days to produce a few seconds of video. Now you can download a morphing program for your PC from the Internet.

So I'm predicting that some day we will all be able to create our own movies with "actors" that we create on our own PC's.

Another truth is that all inventions get applied to sexual activities shortly after they've been invented. (There's the joke about how long it took from when the telephone was invented until the first obscene telephone call was made.) So the obvious result is that people will be making their own porn movies with their own digital people in the privacy of their homes.

This has some pretty interesting aspects. A female actress can be created who can have a vagina which is impossibly large for a real human, plus breasts of whatever size you prefer, etc. etc. And, of course, she'll do whatever you program her to do.

I wonder if this will be good or bad for real relationships?



From: nixoff     Sent: 21 Jan. 2002     Message 9 of 9

Hiya Joe (an' Cindy)!
Methinks we haven't seen the half of it... Just you wait 'til they VR it. :-)
On a more serious note though, I think that it might be a 'bad' thing for relationships in the early days when it will be crude and misused. However, I think it'll be a good thing in the end. It might just enable us to simulate our way out of our more extreme 'divergences' of beach ball-sized breasts and horse-sized dicks so that we can focus on love and personality in real life. And if we can wire a partner into this simulation, well, even sheep might go safe at night... :-)
I guess we'll just have to wait and see, eh? In the meantime I, for one, am happy you guys are real! Keep up the wonderful work!

  [First] [Previous] [Index] [Next] [Last]

All of the material on this web site is copyright © 1995-2006 by Cindy Manlove.
Click on the above link if you wish to use any material from this web site for any purpose other than private viewing.