"Cindy and Joe" Message Archive

Message Archive
home page

Message category
index:
Anal fisting
Attitudes & emotions
Cindy-specific 1999
Cindy-specific 2000
Cindy-specific 2001
Cindy-specific 2002
Cindy-specific 2003
Cindy-specific 2004
Cindy-specific 2005
Cindy-specific 2006
Female ejeculation
Finding a partner
Funny stuff
Giving birth
Group-specific 1999
Group-specific 2000
Group-specific 2001
Group-specific 2002
Group-specific 2003
Group-specific 2004
Group-specific 2005
Group-specific 2006
Health concerns
Kegel exercises
Lubricants
Max. vagina size
Personal experiences
Pics and videos
Professional ladies
Sex toys & objects
Vaginal fisting info

Message: Stereotypes

From: zappaz1 Sent: July 4, 2000 Message 1 of 4

I get some e-mails asking what stereotype best fits a lady who has a very large vagina and can stretch very much. I assume they are trying to find such a mate.

I have to say that there is no one stereotype, but there are tendencies. The list of tendencies would include: A long lower face, Gaps in the teeth, high cheek bones, long fingers, big feet, a large mouth, a umbilicus (or belly button) that is a long distance from their mons or pubis, heavy bone structure, silky elastic type skin, many wrinkles around the labia and lower opening, a mound like protruding back to the upper back pelvis, a very long distance from the crotch to the back of the sacrum, very wide Dimples of Venus, and a large nose.

Some may not consider these the most attractive features in ladies, but I do not feel that way.

The actual weight of the lady, if it is just fat is no indication at all and may make you overestimate.

Of course, the actual pelvic size is the most limiting factor, and the pelvis must be evaluated in three dimensions. Just wide hips is not always indicative.. especially if she is very fat. Both the upper and lower pelvis must be wide and the pelvic height and the front to back depth are more important than the width. As mentioned the high umbilicus helps tell the height, unless the belly fat hangs down. The mound like upper back of the pelvis indicates a backward tilting sacrum which makes the front to back vaginal size greater. Probably the most limiting factor is the Pinbone Distance which I have discussed elsewhere and limits the side to side potential for stretching. If you get a feeling of the lady being massive but not due to fat, that is also a strong indication of large vaginal or potential vaginal size. Height helps some. Bean-pole height is not indicative, but the very largest I have seen combined the above features with great height.

I hope this helps answer the questions of those looking for mates with very large vaginas.

Do not ask me for a picture of the largest lady of this type I have seen to demonstrate this appearance, as I have none (I recently saw an image of one possibly similar to her).

Good luck finding someone.

zappaz1@excite.com

From: [unknown] Sent: July 4, 2000 Message 2 of 4

Zappaz...

Wow, that doesn't sound anything like me...until just recently, I was quite small in size...I'm only 5'2"...and now weigh in at 170...and I HAVE lost about 30 pounds recently!!

The weight gain was due to medication I was taking after having 2 heart attacks in 14 months time...docotr didn't have me on the right stuff!! But, now I am, and I am losing again!!

Big nose, buck teeth...oh my!! I could send you a picture, you might be surprised...this was sterotyping at it's very worst!!! I hope that the rest of the ladies don't take it to heart...I don't...just thought you would like to know, that I disagreee with what you have said...I know a few women who are into fisting...and we don't all have huge, gaping vaginas.

Do you have a little cock and small hands??? Alot of guys do!!

See what I mean??

Gayle

From: zappaz1 Sent: July 4, 2000 Message 3 of 4

GayleN53,

I am very sorry you took my list of attributes to refer to common fisting or stretching practice. They definitely do not refer to anything but extreme examples. Please accept my apology for this misunderstanding.

I did not mention "fisting", and was not at all referring to ordinary degrees of stretching. These things can be done by most any healthy lady who practices stretching. For ordinary degrees of stretching and ordinary fisting, I know of absolutely no physical tendencies that point in that direction.

I received several questions asking what the most _extreme types_, might show. As I mentioned above, there is "no one stereotype" for those having a "very large vagina", and who can "stretch very much". I should have said that "very large" to me meant those who can easily stretch over 5 inches diameter. These extreme types do tend to have certain tendencies more commonly found that in ladies like yourself.

Even though none of the tendencies I mentioned apply to you, I meant this as no aspersion on anyone. I do not consider those extreme types, that tend to have the attributes mentioned, to be homely or unattractive. If you do, then that is not our shared opinion. I have know ladies with these features who are absolutely huge in the pelvic department and I definitely _do not_ consider them ugly or unattractive.

Fisting as seen on the internet is usually done by ladies most consider pretty and petite types. Almost any sized lady who is healthy is "capable" of doing that.

I merely listed some attributes that tend to point toward "extreme degrees" of potential vaginal size. I personally may consider these attributes nice or even attractive, but realize from your post, you do not agree. These are just little attributes that are somewhat more common in those whose size goes beyond just fisting and beyond ordinary stretching.

One doesn't need to have "any" of these attributes to do stretching to say 4 ½ inch diameter, as evidenced by pretty little ladies like BJ, Ty, and many others who can stretch that size easily.

zappaz1@excite.com

From: zappaz1 Sent: July 5, 2000 Message 4 of 4

GayleN53,

In order that you and other Club members will understand the type of lady I was discussing above, I will post a File in the File Section of this club called "Potentially Large Lady". That way you will know that I was "not" referring to ordinary stretching or ordinary fisting.. which most ladies can potentially do.

The ladies like this one are somewhat rare and all those that I have known (who could easily stretch more than 5 inches vaginally) had at least some of the features or attributes I mentioned above. Naturally, by statistics, this ability to stretch a large size (most likely) does not apply to any of our Club members.

The image I will post is of a nice Black Lady who might potentially be what I consider "large".

All the ladies that I found that I considered large were Caucasian.. but race has nothing to do with it, and statistics probably kept me from finding a large Black Lady.

There are other attributes that tend to go along with the very large vaginas and stretching ability, but I will not bore you with them :-) I find these attributes are not to be considered negatively, and even find some attractive. I understand how some might think otherwise.

I only post this to show what I was referring to.. as she resembles some I have known.. lol

Again I apologize if there was misunderstanding.

zappaz1@excite.com